| PAP Nee Soon
  • Latest
    • Events
    • Lifestyle
    • Commentary
  • Volunteer
    • Budget 2023
      • GE2020
        • Manifesto 2020
        • Emerging Stronger Together
        • A Brighter Future Together
        • Better Nee Soon
        • More Exciting Plans for Nee Soon
        • Map of improvements
        • Healthcare Hub of the North
        • Caring, Sustainable Town
        • No One Left Behind
        • Home With a Heart
      • Connect
        • Shanmugam’s Story: Keeping Our Homes Safe
        • Faishal’s story: Believe in People
        • Louis’ story:  Every Kid Deserves a Childhood
        • Derrick’s story: Putting Heartlanders First
        • Carrie’s Story: A Volunteering Trip that Changed Her Life
        • PAP Nee Soon Facebook Page
      • Contact
    | PAP Nee Soon
    • Latest
    • Volunteer
    • Budget 2023
    • GE2020
    • Connect
    • Contact
    • Latest
      • Events
      • Lifestyle
      • Commentary
    • Volunteer
    • Budget 2023
    • GE2020
      • Manifesto 2020
      • Emerging Stronger Together
      • A Brighter Future Together
      • Better Nee Soon
      • More Exciting Plans for Nee Soon
      • Map of improvements
      • Healthcare Hub of the North
      • Caring, Sustainable Town
      • No One Left Behind
      • Home With a Heart
    • Connect
      • Shanmugam’s Story: Keeping Our Homes Safe
      • Faishal’s story: Believe in People
      • Louis’ story:  Every Kid Deserves a Childhood
      • Derrick’s story: Putting Heartlanders First
      • Carrie’s Story: A Volunteering Trip that Changed Her Life
      • PAP Nee Soon Facebook Page
    • Contact

    Latest > Commentary

    Louis Ng on Extradition (Amendment) Bill

    Speech by Mr Louis Ng Kok Kwang, MP for Nee Soon GRC, at the Second Reading of the Extradition (Amendment) Bill (Bill No. 10/2022)

    Introduction

    This Bill is a welcome reform of our extradition regime. It reduces bureaucracy for a whole slew of parties, including individuals facing possible extradition, jurisdictions requesting the extradition and judges making decisions on extradition.

    I have three points of clarification to raise.

    Restrictions on surrender to Commonwealth territories 

    My first point is on the surrender of persons to “declared” Commonwealth territories

    Can Minister clarify why the surrenders of persons to Commonwealth territories are restricted in special ways?

    For example, Section 28 categorises offences against the life of a political figure and their immediate family as non-political offences.

    What is the significance of this specific carve-out? And why, in general, do additional restrictions apply in cases where Commonwealth territories are the ones requesting the extradition?

    Scenarios of Ministerial discretion

    My second point today is about Ministerial discretion.

    Multiple sections in this Bill empower the Minister to exercise their discretion to decide for or against extradition.

    In Section 29, for instance, the Minister may refuse to extradite a person to a Commonwealth territory in multiple cases, including when a person’s conviction was obtained in their absence.

    In Section 8(8), the Minister may refuse to extradite a person to a foreign state when their remaining sentence is minimal.

    Can Minister share scenarios on how discretion is meant to be exercised for such cases?

    For Section 8(8), when might we choose to extradite someone even though their remaining sentence is minimal? This would seem to run against the intent of the subsection, which is to empower the Government to save resources.

    Use of summary of evidence 

    My last point is about the use of summarised evidence.

    The Bill allows a foreign jurisdiction requesting extradition to provide evidence by, in essence, summarising it.

    Can Minister share what mechanisms are in place to ensure that this summary of evidence is sufficient for the Minister to make the required determinations under the Act?

    For instance, section 10 restricts the Minister’s power to order the surrender of persons if the Minister has substantial grounds for believing that the person would be persecuted for reasons of race, religion, sex, ethnic origin, nationality, or political opinion.

    What mechanisms are in place to ensure this summary is sufficient for the Minister to ascertain if such substantial grounds exist?

    Conclusion 

    Notwithstanding these clarifications, Sir, I stand in support of the Bill.

    Watch the speech here.

    READ MORE Commentary , Latest

    • On living conditions of migrant workers
    • On support for adult persons with special needs or disabilities
    • On prevention and detection of anti-money laundering activities
    • Louis Ng on Income Tax (Amendment) Bill
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    COPYRIGHT © PEOPLE'S ACTION PARTY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Published by People's Action Party Chong Pang branch, at the direction of K Shanmugam
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    COPYRIGHT © PEOPLE'S ACTION PARTY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Published by People's Action Party Chong Pang branch, at the direction of K Shanmugam