| PAP Nee Soon
  • Latest
    • Events
    • Lifestyle
    • Commentary
  • Volunteer
    • Budget 2023
      • GE2020
        • Manifesto 2020
        • Emerging Stronger Together
        • A Brighter Future Together
        • Better Nee Soon
        • More Exciting Plans for Nee Soon
        • Map of improvements
        • Healthcare Hub of the North
        • Caring, Sustainable Town
        • No One Left Behind
        • Home With a Heart
      • Connect
        • Shanmugam’s Story: Keeping Our Homes Safe
        • Faishal’s story: Believe in People
        • Louis’ story:  Every Kid Deserves a Childhood
        • Derrick’s story: Putting Heartlanders First
        • Carrie’s Story: A Volunteering Trip that Changed Her Life
        • PAP Nee Soon Facebook Page
      • Contact
    | PAP Nee Soon
    • Latest
    • Volunteer
    • Budget 2023
    • GE2020
    • Connect
    • Contact
    • Latest
      • Events
      • Lifestyle
      • Commentary
    • Volunteer
    • Budget 2023
    • GE2020
      • Manifesto 2020
      • Emerging Stronger Together
      • A Brighter Future Together
      • Better Nee Soon
      • More Exciting Plans for Nee Soon
      • Map of improvements
      • Healthcare Hub of the North
      • Caring, Sustainable Town
      • No One Left Behind
      • Home With a Heart
    • Connect
      • Shanmugam’s Story: Keeping Our Homes Safe
      • Faishal’s story: Believe in People
      • Louis’ story:  Every Kid Deserves a Childhood
      • Derrick’s story: Putting Heartlanders First
      • Carrie’s Story: A Volunteering Trip that Changed Her Life
      • PAP Nee Soon Facebook Page
    • Contact

    Latest > Commentary

    Statute Law Reform Bill (Bill No. 45/2020)

    Speech by Mr. Louis Ng Kok Kwang, MP for Nee Soon GRC, at the Second Reading of the Statute Law Reform Bill (Bill No. 45/2020) 

    Introduction

    Madam, this Bill will update and refine drafting practices, clarify the system for delegation of ministerial functions, and provide for parliament’s continuity arrangements.

    These are necessary and welcomed amendments.

    I will focus on the amendments on the delegation of ministerial functions. I have three points to raise. 

    Inferring intention against delegation of function to a public officer or public body

    First, the Bill proposes to allow the delegation of a Minister’s function to a public body or public officer unless express or implied contrary intention appears in the Act.

    It would be very useful to the Court to have clear guidance on how contrary intention should be inferred.

    The Court of Appeal in Asia Development Pte Ltd v Attorney-General [2020] SGCA 22 cited an English case for the position that the Court should consider the nature, scope and purpose of the function vested in the Minister, and the relevant language of the statute and of the specific provision.

    Can the Minister provide more specific guidance on what factors should be considered in inferring implied contrary intention?

    Moving forward, will the Ministry consider requiring Ministries to include more express language on the delegation of Ministerial function when drafting Bills to avoid Courts having to go through the process of inferring intention?

    Practice of identifying role and capacity of government agencies 

    Second, the Bill allows delegation of function to a public body or a public officer.

    Helpfully, the Bill clarifies that if a ministerial function depends on the Minister’s opinion, belief, or state of mind, the delegate may exercise the function based on the delegate’s opinion, belief, or state of mind.

    While this can be done where ministerial function is delegated to a public officer, it is less clear how opinion, belief, or state of mind of a public body should be determined.

    Can the Minister clarify how a public body’s opinion, belief, or state of mind should be determined?

    Delegation of function to a public body

    Third, the Court of Appeal in Asia Development Pte Ltd v Attorney-General [2020] SGCA 22 suggested that it is good practice for government agencies to clearly identify the role and capacity in which they are acting, and to explain this promptly when challenged.

    The Court also noted that it would be helpful to adopt a measure of formality in communication of government decisions so that there is little room of confusion over which party one is dealing with and in what capacity they are acting.

    Can the Minister share if there are plans for public agencies to adopt the Court’s recommendation in practice?

    Conclusion

    Sir, notwithstanding my clarifications, I stand in support of this Bill.

    Watch this speech here.

    READ MORE Commentary , Latest

    • On living conditions of migrant workers
    • On support for adult persons with special needs or disabilities
    • On prevention and detection of anti-money laundering activities
    • Louis Ng on Income Tax (Amendment) Bill
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    COPYRIGHT © PEOPLE'S ACTION PARTY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Published by People's Action Party Chong Pang branch, at the direction of K Shanmugam
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    COPYRIGHT © PEOPLE'S ACTION PARTY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Published by People's Action Party Chong Pang branch, at the direction of K Shanmugam